Background: To evaluate the analytical performance of five commercial acetaminophen assays and select the best method for routine use.
Methods: Imprecision, accuracy, linearity, and interferences of three enzymatic assays (Beckman Coulter AU Paracetamol, Abbott MULTIGENT Acetaminophen, and Sekisui Acetaminophen L3K) and two immunoassay-based assays (Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON ACTM (Acetaminophen) Reagent and Siemens SYVA Emit-tox Acetaminophen) were evaluated on a Beckman Coulter AU680 chemistry analyzer. Hook effect for immunoassay-based assays and recovery in ultrafiltrate for enzymatic methods were studied.
Results: Within-run and between-run imprecision of the enzymatic assays ranged 0.26%-0.82% and 0.53%-2.86%, respectively, while that for the immunoassay-based methods ranged 0.96%-6.34% and 1.50%-11.33%, respectively. All assays except the SYNCHRON assay fell within the program analytical performance specifications (±20 µmol/L or 10%) for external quality assurance (EQA) samples, with the highest positive bias (31.7%) observed in the SYNCHRON assay. Icteric interference was demonstrated most significantly in the Abbott assay (up to 88 μmol/L positive bias in blank serum). The lipemic interference on the SYNCHRON was significant (up to 110% positive bias at level of 100 μmol/L). The immunoassay-based methods were less susceptible to hemolytic interference, while the Abbott and AU assays were more susceptible to N-acetylcysteine interference. Both immunoassay-based methods showed no hook effect up to 18 000 μmol/L. Ultrafiltration recoveries for enzymatic methods were satisfactory, ranging from 80.0% ± 5.1% to 89.5% ± 3.0%.
Conclusions: Proportional bias was observed in the SYNCHRON assay, while the Siemens and Sekisui assays were minimally affected by bilirubin interferences.
Keywords: Acetaminophen; enzymatic assay; evaluation; immunoassay.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.