Variation of soil bacterial communities along a chronosequence of Eucalyptus plantation

PeerJ. 2018 Sep 24:6:e5648. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5648. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Eucalyptus is harvested for wood and fiber production in many tropical and sub-tropical habitats globally. Plantation has been controversial because of its influence on the surrounding environment, however, the influence of massive Eucalyptus planting on soil microbial communities is unclear. Here we applied high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to assess the microbial community composition and diversity of planting chronosequences, involving two, five and ten years of Eucalyptus plantation, comparing to that of secondary-forest in South China. We found that significant changes in the composition of soil bacteria occurred when the forests were converted from secondary-forest to Eucalyptus. The bacterial community structure was clearly distinct from control and five year samples after Eucalyptus was grown for 2 and 10 years, highlighting the influence of this plantation on local soil microbial communities. These groupings indicated a cycle of impact (2 and 10 year plantations) and low impact (5-year plantations) in this chronosequence of Eucalyptus plantation. Community patterns were underpinned by shifts in soil properties such as pH and phosphorus concentration. Concurrently, key soil taxonomic groups such as Actinobacteria showed abundance shifts, increasing in impacted plantations and decreasing in low impacted samples. Shifts in taxonomy were reflected in a shift in metabolic potential, including pathways for nutrient cycles such as carbon fixation, which changed in abundance over time following Eucalyptus plantation. Combined these results confirm that Eucalyptus plantation can change the community structure and diversity of soil microorganisms with strong implications for land-management and maintaining the health of these ecosystems.

Keywords: Eucalyptus plantation; Soil microbial ecology; Soil microorganisms.

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.6275183.v1

Grants and funding

This work was financially supported by the Project of the Department of Forest of Guangdong Province (Grant No. YUE CAI NONG [2017] No. 83) and the Project of State Forestry and Grassland Administration. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.