Background: Cranial reconstruction with autologous bone is still the gold standard although several biomaterials are available to re-establish the integrity of the cranial vault. Due to their biological and morphological characteristics, hydroxyapatite implants show promising results in small clinical cohort studies, especially within the paediatric population. Its biocompatibility and osteoconductivity should allow the formation of osseous bridging at the skull-prosthesis interface.
Objective: To examine the possible occurrence of osteointegration and to quantify it.
Methods: A retrospective study of patients with a hydroxyapatite implant from 2010 to 2014 at our neurosurgical department was conducted. Demographic, surgical and radiological data were studied. A senior neuroradiologist, a staff member neurosurgeon and a resident neurosurgeon independently performed the radiological evaluation. A new software analysis technique was developed to objectively quantify the degree of osteointegration.
Results: Seventeen implants were evaluated with an average patient age of 39 years and a mean follow-up of 155 weeks. Through radiologic evaluation, osseous bridging was deemed higher than 50% in six prostheses and higher than 75% in three. In five patients, no osteointegration could be seen. The remaining patients exhibited sparse signs of osteointegration, estimated between 10 and 50%. Software analysis showed an average osteointegration ratio of 37.4% with a 400-HU filter and 27.3% with a 700-HU filter.
Conclusion: In this small retrospective study of cranial hydroxyapatite implants, osteointegration did occur and to a degree of more than 50% in 1/3 of the patients.
Keywords: Cranioplasty; Custom-made prosthesis; Hydroxyapatite; Osteointegration.