Comparison of Significant Carotid Stenosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Conventional Two-Dimensional Radiotherapy

Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 17;8(1):13899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32398-y.

Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) serves as the most efficient treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and can cause carotid stenosis. This work compared the incidence of significant carotid stenosis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for NPC and explored the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed 233 cases with NPC who underwent carotid ultrasound post IMRT or 2D-RT from 2006 to 2015. The incidence of significant stenosis after RT was 19.3%. Significant stenosis was identified in 20 (14.6%) of 137 patients treated with IMRT and 25 (26.0%) of 96 patients with 2D-RT, respectively (p = 0.035). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated age (odds ratio = 1.054, 95% CI = 1.011-1.099, p = 0.014), radiation technique (IMRT) (odds ratio = 0.471, 95%CI = 0.241-0.919, p = 0.027) and time interval (odds ratio = 1.068, 95%CI = 1.033-1.105, p = 0.001) as independent predictors for significant carotid stenosis. Our study suggests that IMRT was associated with decreased incidence of significant carotid stenosis versus 2D-RT for NPC. Prevention and carotid ultrasound should be considered for older NPC survivors with longer interval from RT, especially those treated with 2D-RT.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carotid Stenosis / etiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma / radiotherapy*
  • Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / adverse effects*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Young Adult