Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparison of double-layer, double-row and suture bridge methods

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 11;19(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2244-y.

Abstract

Background: The suture-bridge (SB) method has recently become the mainstream means of repairing full-thickness rotator cuff tears. However, in some patients the deep and superficial layers have moved in different directions because of delamination of their rotator cuffs. In such cases, a simple suture (double-layer, double-row [DD] method) is used to repair the superficial and deep layers separately. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and re-tear rates of the DD and SB methods, with patients selected according to the condition of their torn cuffs.

Methods: We retrospectively registered 74 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears that had been repaired arthroscopically, 35 shoulders by the DD and 39 by the SB method. Mean ages were 66.1 years in the DD and 62.9 years in the SB group. We evaluated clinical status before and after surgery (Japanese Orthopedic Association [JOA] scores) and re-tear rate. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to compare JOA scores and active ROM between before and after surgery in each group. Mann-Whitney's U test was used for comparing JOA scores, active ROM, re-tear rates, size of tear, duration of follow-up, sex, and presence of subscapular muscle repair between the DD and SB groups. A hazard ratio of less than 5% was considered to denote significance.

Results: JOA scores improved significantly in the DD and SB groups from preoperative means of 63.4 and 63.3 points, respectively, to postoperative means of 91.8 and 92.1 points, respectively. The active flexural ROM improved significantly from means of 110.1° and 100.0°, respectively, to postoperative means of 142.3° and 142.7°, respectively; the differences between groups were not significant. Re-tear occurred in 5.9% of the DD (two of 34 shoulders) and 7.9% of the SB group (three of 38 shoulders); its incidence did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions: Both the DD and SB methods achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes that do not differ significantly. Our results suggest that careful selection of operative method on the basis of the delamination pattern in patients undergoing RCT may reduce the re-tear rate after utilizing the SB method.

Keywords: Arthroscope; Delamination; Double-row method; Rotator cuff repair; Suture-bridge method.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthroscopy* / adverse effects
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Recovery of Function
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Rotator Cuff / diagnostic imaging
  • Rotator Cuff / physiopathology
  • Rotator Cuff / surgery*
  • Rotator Cuff Injuries / diagnostic imaging
  • Rotator Cuff Injuries / physiopathology
  • Rotator Cuff Injuries / surgery*
  • Suture Techniques* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome