Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11954. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011954.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were selected for systematic review of trials that compared outcomes of LNU and ONU. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 13.0 software.

Results: LNU was associated with longer operation time (P < .001), shorter hospital stay (P < .001), less blood loss (P = .006) and lower rate of transfusion (P < .001). The occurrence of complications, including minor (P = .52), major (P = .21) and total complications (P = .19) were similar between LNU and ONU. There was no significant difference in the rate of 5-year recurrence-free survival (P = .90), 5-year cancer-specific survival (P = .12), and 5-year overall survival (P = .11) as well as 2-year RFS (P = .84), 2-year CSS (P = .86), and 2-year OS (P = .25).

Conclusion: Our results indicated that LNU is a safe and effective method to treat UTUC. Given the limitations of this study, further multicenter, randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma / mortality
  • Carcinoma / surgery*
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Laparoscopy / mortality*
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephroureterectomy / methods
  • Nephroureterectomy / mortality*
  • Operative Time
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urologic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Urologic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Urothelium / surgery*