Drawing and tracing tasks, by being relatively easy to execute and evaluate, have been incorporated in many paradigms used to study motor control. While these tasks are helpful when examining various aspects relative to the performance, the relationship in proficiency between these tasks was not evaluated to our knowledge. Seeing that drawing is thought to be an internally cued and tracing an externally cued task, differences in performances are to be expected. In this study, a quantitative evaluation of the precision of circle drawing and tracing, and spiral tracing was made on 150 healthy subjects. Our results show that, while precision is correlated when repeating drawing circles, tracing spirals, or tracing circles as well as between tracing spirals and tracing circles; there is no correlation when subjects performed drawing circles and tracing spirals or between drawing and tracing of circles. These results suggest that this lack of correlation is task dependent and not shape dependent. We suggest that the evaluation of fine motor control should include both a tracing and a drawing task, taking in consideration the precision in each task. We believe that this approach could help not only to evaluate fine motor control more accurately, but also to identify subjects who are more reliant on either internal or external cueing and to what extent.
Keywords: Circle drawing; Circle tracing; Externally cued task; Fine motor control; Internally cued task; Spiral tracing.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.