Enhancing and Advancing Shared Governance Through a Targeted Decision-Making Redesign

J Nurs Adm. 2018 Sep;48(9):445-451. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000647.

Abstract

Objective: The study aim was to determine if a targeted redesign of shared decision making improved shared governance (SG).

Background: Nursing SG is collaborative decision making between nurses at every level; it improves quality of care, empowers nurses, and enhances nurse satisfaction.

Methods: Using a quasi-experimental, pretest/posttest design, researchers electronically distributed the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) to an inclusive, convenience sample of RNs in a Magnet®-designated 377-bed community medical center. Preintervention scores were used to tailor a redesign of shared decision making, and postintervention data were collected within 1 year to measure outcomes.

Results: IPNG overall score and 5 of 6 subscale scores significantly increased after the redesign.

Conclusions: Changes to an SG structure can take 2 to 5 years to be realized. Our findings corroborate that the IPNG is a valuable tool in promoting setting-specific SG.

MeSH terms

  • California
  • Clinical Governance / standards*
  • Community Health Services / organization & administration
  • Cooperative Behavior*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Decision Making*
  • Humans
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital / psychology*
  • Power, Psychological
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Reproducibility of Results