Predictive factors for initiating hypomethylating agents' (HMAs) treatment and the survival benefit of HMAs for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS) are still unknown. This study evaluated the factors affecting the use of HMAs and compared long-term outcomes between best supportive care (BSC) and HMA groups after matching baseline clinical factors. Data of 353 patients diagnosed with LR-MDS by International Prognostic Scoring System between October 1992 and July 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. HMAs were administered continuously until a clinical response or progression. HMAs were administered to 243 patients with median 45 days (range 0-7078 days) after diagnosis, while 110 patients were treated with BSC. HMAs were administered over a median of 5 cycles and overall response was achieved in 104 patients (42.8%). The cumulative incidence of HMA treatment increased in higher-risk groups by other risk scoring systems. Three-year overall survival (OS) rate was higher in BSC group (69.1%) than HMA responders (47.4%, p = 0.065) or HMA non-responders (46.3%, p = 0.005). Among 162 case-matched cohorts, 3-year OS rates were comparable between the BSC group (67.1%) and HMA responders (58.1%, p = 0.914), while that of HMA non-responder was low (32.2%, p < 0.001). In the case-matched cohorts, HMA non-responder were associated with inferior OS rate in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 3.01, p = 0.001). Higher-risk groups by other clinical risk scoring systems among IPSS lower-risk patients showed an increased incidence of using HMAs. The OS rate of HMA responders among case-matched cohorts showed an improved OS rate similar to the BSC group.
Keywords: Azacitidine; Decitabine; Hypomethylating agents; IPSS; Myelodysplastic syndrome.