[Comparison of adhesive seal morphology between APC™ PLUS and APC™ Flash-Free Adhesive Coated brackets]

Orthod Fr. 2018 Jun;89(2):191-197. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2018012. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Introduction: Does the new adhesive-coated APC™ Flash-Free bracket from the 3M Unitek® group simplify the bonding protocol without compromising precision?

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the morphology of the adhesive joint between the classic APC™ PLUS adhesive-coated brackets and APC™ Flash-Free brackets.

Materials and methods: In vitro bonding of esthetic brackets in the CLARITY™ ADVANCED range was performed to compare the morphology of the excess flash between APC™ PLUS and APC™ Flash-Free brackets.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found concerning the morphology of the excess flash between APC™ PLUS and APC™ Flash-Free brackets. A statistically significant difference was found regarding the thickness of the adhesive between the two types of bracket. The adhesive used for the APC™ Flash-Free brackets was significantly thicker than for the APC™ PLUS brackets (P=0.0001). Adhesive thickness was also more homogeneous on the APC™ Flash-Free brackets (P=0.001 for the relative difference).

Conclusion: The adhesive is thicker but adhesive homogeneity is greater with APC™ Flash-Free brackets than with APC™ PLUS brackets.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adhesiveness
  • Curing Lights, Dental
  • Dental Bonding / adverse effects
  • Dental Bonding / instrumentation
  • Dental Bonding / methods
  • Dental Cements / adverse effects
  • Dental Cements / analysis*
  • Dental Cements / chemistry
  • Dental Cements / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Orthodontic Brackets*
  • Tooth Movement Techniques / instrumentation
  • Tooth Movement Techniques / methods

Substances

  • Dental Cements