Background: Small-bore aspiration catheters (Aspiration Kit®) cause less pain than conventional trocar catheters in patients. The objective of this study was to examine the usefulness of these less invasive small-bore aspiration catheters for drainage of pneumothorax.
Methods: Baseline characteristics and laboratory test data at admission of 70 patients who were admitted to and underwent drainage treatment for pneumothorax at our hospital between April 2011 and February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed based on their medical records. The primary endpoints were factors associated with drainage treatment failure, and baseline characteristics and laboratory test data were compared between those treated with a small-bore aspiration catheter and those treated with a trocar catheter.
Results: The numbers of patients with anticoagulant use (P < 0.0001), ischemic stroke (P = 0.0063), and atrial fibrillation (P = 0.0410) were significantly different between the two groups. No significant intergroup differences were noted with respect to the length of hospitalization, drainage duration, subcutaneous emphysema, and treatment failure. Logistic regression analyses of baseline characteristics showed that the severity of pneumothorax, localization of pneumothorax, and recurrent pneumothorax were significantly associated with drainage treatment failure, but the type of drainage catheter was not significantly associated with treatment failure. [Conclusions] The results suggest that small-bore aspiration catheters, which cause less pain in patients, are potentially useful for pneumothorax drainage.
Keywords: Pneumothorax; Small-bore aspiration catheter; Trocar catheter.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.