Is there more than the sewage plant? University freshmen's conceptions of the urban water cycle

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0200928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200928. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The concepts of 340 university freshmen concerning urban water cycles include various misconceptions (or intuitive conceptions) which severely contrast with correct scientific ones. Almost no student knew the correct urban water cycle in total, including cycle steps in the appropriate sequence: consumer (given), sewage-plant, nature and waterworks. Concepts mainly omit nature and waterworks, only the sewage plant is included in almost all concepts. This reflects an exaggeration of the importance of the cycle-step sewage plant relative to the other steps, when the topic is taught in school. Students acquired knowledge from two main sources: School and media. Most students are aware of the origin of drinking water, although several concepts reflect a pipe-to-pipe system, where wastewater is cleared in sewage plants and brought back to consumers, skipping the roles of nature and waterworks. Everyday matters with an important impact on our life-standards, like the urban water cycle, need specific attention during school time. Currently, only primary school syllabi include the issue of urban water cycles in Germany. More effort is needed to explain wastewater and drinking water issues in order to correct misconceptions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Environmental Monitoring*
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Sanitation
  • Sewage / chemistry*
  • Students*
  • Universities
  • Wastewater / chemistry*
  • Water Cycle*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Sewage
  • Waste Water

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research): WAVE2015-820-3290-055; TrinkWave: Planungsoptionen und Technologien der Wasserwiederverwendung zur Stützung der Trinkwasserversorgung in urbanen Wasserkreisläufen. All statements made by the authors need not necessarily reflect the opinion of the BMBF. Furthermore the study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), and the University of Bayreuth in the funding program Open Access Publishing.