Objectives: Cardiac lead perforation is a rare but potentially life-threatening event. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performances of chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT in the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.
Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the ethics review board of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital at Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China), and the need to obtain informed consent was waived. Between May 2010 and Oct 2017, 52 patients were clinically suspected to have a cardiac lead perforation and received chest radiography, TTE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. Among them, 13 patients were identified as having cardiac lead perforation. The diagnostic performances of these three modalities were evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves using a composite reference standard of surgical and electrophysiological results and clinical follow-up. The areas under ROCs (AUROCs) were compared with the McNemar test.
Results: The accuracies of chest radiography, TTE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac lead perforation were 73.1%, 82.7% and 98.1%, respectively. ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT had a higher AUROC than chest radiography (p < 0.001) and TTE (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT is superior to both chest radiography and TTE imaging for the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.
Key points: • ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT has an accuracy of 98.1% in the diagnosis of cardiac lead perforation. • The AUROC of ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT is higher than those of chest radiography and TTE imaging. • ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging has better diagnostic performance than both chest radiography and TTE imaging for the assessment of cardiac lead perforation.
Keywords: Echocardiography; Heart injury; Radiography; Tomography, x-ray computed.