Comprehensive Validation of Cytology Specimens for Next-Generation Sequencing and Clinical Practice Experience

Abstract

Biopsy specimens are subjected to an expanding portfolio of assays that regularly include mutation profiling via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Specimens derived via fine-needle aspiration, a common biopsy technique, are subjected to a variety of cytopreparatory methods compared with surgical biopsies that are almost uniformly processed as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Therefore, the fine-needle aspiration-derived specimens most commonly accepted for molecular analysis are cell blocks (CBs), because they are processed most similarly to surgical biopsy tissue. However, CB preparations are fraught with challenges that risk unsuccessful sequencing and repeat biopsies, with the potential to further increase health care costs and delay clinical care. The diversity of cytopreparations and the resource-intensive clinical validation of NGS pose significant challenges to more consistent use of non-CB (NCB) cytology specimens. As part of clinical validation of a targeted NGS assay, DNA subjected to nine cytopreparatory methods was evaluated for sequencing performance and was shown to be uniformly acceptable for clinical NGS. Of the 379 clinical cases analyzed after validation, the majority (56%) were derived from NCB cytology specimens. This specimen class had the lowest DNA insufficiency rate (1.5%) and showed equivalent sequencing performance to surgical and CB formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. NCB cytology specimens are valuable sources of tumor nucleic acid and are the preferred specimen type for clinical NGS at our institution.