Objectives: We estimated the diagnostic accuracy of T2Candida, with blood culture (BC) as the gold standard, and compared turnaround time between these two techniques in order to investigate the potential role of T2Candida in the management of empirical antifungal treatment (EAT).
Methods: We performed a single-centre prospective observational study in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and multiple risk factors for candidaemia.
Results: We analysed 46 out of 50 screened patients. All patients received an echinocandin as EAT; the median EAT duration was 7 days (IQR 4-13 days). BCs were negative in 31 (67.4%) patients, positive for bacteria in 14 (30.4%) patients and positive for Candida albicans in 1 (2.2%) patient. T2Candida was negative, invalid and positive in 37, 5 and 4 patients, respectively. T2Candida and BC results were concordant in all but three patients, where T2Candida was positive and BCs were negative. Two of them were on antifungal prophylaxis at the time of enrolment. T2Candida reduced time to a negative result by 5 days. T2Candida performance was: sensitivity = 100% (95% CI 2.5%-100%), specificity = 91.8% (95% CI 78%-98%), positive predictive value = 25% (95% CI 0.63%-80.6%) and negative predictive value = 100% (95% CI 89.7%-100%).
Conclusions: In patients with multiple risk factors for candidaemia and severe sepsis or septic shock, T2Candida may be helpful to reduce the length of EAT.