Comparative demography of commercially-harvested snappers and an emperor from American Samoa

PeerJ. 2018 Jun 18:6:e5069. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5069. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The age-based life history of two commercially-important species of snapper (Lutjanidae) and one emperor (Lethrinidae) were characterized from the nearshore fishery of Tutuila, American Samoa. Examination of sagittal otoliths across multiple months and years confirmed the annual deposition of increments and highlighted marked variation in life-history patterns among the three meso-predator species. The humpback red snapper Lutjanus gibbus is a medium-bodied gonochoristic species which exhibits striking sexual dimorphism in length-at-age and consequent growth trajectories and has a life span estimated to be at least 27 years. The yellow-lined snapper Lutjanus rufolineatus is a small-bodied gonochore with weak sexual dimorphism, early maturation, and a short life span of at least 12 years. The yellow-lip emperor Lethrinus xanthochilus is a large-bodied species with a moderate life span (estimated to be at least 19 years in this study), rapid initial growth, and a more complex sexual ontogeny likely involving pre- or post-maturational sex change, although this remains unresolved at present. Ratios of natural to fishing mortality indicate a low level of prevailing exploitation for all three species, which is supported by low proportions of immature female length classes captured by the fishery. However, considerable demographic variability among the three species highlights the value of detailed age-based information as a necessary component for informing monitoring efforts and future management decisions.

Keywords: Emperorfish; Fishery; Life history; Otolith; Polynesia; Reproduction; Snapper.

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the National Marine Fisheries Service Biosampling Initiative and the Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Territorial Biosampling Project 6105137. There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.