Radiographic Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine Based on Sagittal Balance: A Reliability Study

Spine Deform. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):358-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.12.001.

Abstract

Study design: Inter- and intraobserver reliability study.

Object: To assess the reliability of a new radiographic classification of degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine (DSLS).

Summary of background data: DSLS is a common cause of chronic low back and leg pain in adults. To this date, there is no consensus for a comprehensive analysis of DSLS. The reliability of a new DSLS classification system based on sagittal alignment was assessed.

Methods: Ninety-nine patients admitted to our spinal surgery department for surgical treatment of DSLS between January 2012 and December 2015 were included. Three observers measured sagittal alignment parameters with validated software: segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Full body low-dose lateral view radiographs were analyzed and classified according to three main types: Type 1A: preserved LL and SL; Type 1B: preserved LL and reduced SL (≤5°); Type 2A: PI-LL ≥10° without pelvic compensation (PT <25°); Type 2B: PI-LL ≥10° with pelvic compensation (PT ≥25°); Type 3: global sagittal malalignment (SVA ≥40 mm). The three observers classified radiographs twice with a 3-week interval for intraobserver reproducibility. Interobserver reproducibility was calculated using Fleiss κ and intra-class coefficient. Intraobserver reproducibility was calculated using Cohen κ.

Results: Mean age was 68.8 ± 9.8 years. Mean sagittal alignment parameters values were the following: PI: 60.1° ± 12.7°; PI-LL was 12.2° ± 13.9°, PT: 24.7° ± 8.5°; SVA: 44.9 mm ± 44.6 mm; SL: 16.6° ± 8.4°. Intraobserver repeatability showed an almost perfect agreement (ICC > 0.92 and Cohen κ > 0.89 for each observer). Fleiss κ value for interobserver reproducibility was 0.82, with percentage agreement among observers between 88% and 89%.

Conclusion: This new classification showed an excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability. This simple method could be an additional sagittal balance tool helping surgeons improve their preoperative DSLS analysis.

Keywords: Classification system; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Lumbar spine; Spondylolisthesis.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiography / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spondylolisthesis / classification
  • Spondylolisthesis / diagnostic imaging*