Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts on age-related macular degeneration health care: a cross-sectional quantification of the adherence to CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations

BMJ Open. 2018 May 22;8(5):e021912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021912.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reporting quality of randomised controlled trial (RCT) abstracts on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) healthcare, to evaluate the adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement's recommendations on minimum abstract information and to identify journal characteristics associated with abstract reporting quality.

Design: Cross-sectional evaluation of RCT abstracts on AMD healthcare.

Methods: A PubMed search was implemented to identify RCT abstracts on AMD healthcare published in the English language between January 2004 and December 2013. Data extraction was performed by two parallel readers independently by means of a documentation format in accordance with the 16 items of the CONSORT checklist for abstracts. The total number of criteria fulfilled by an abstract was derived as primary endpoint of the investigation; incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with unadjusted 95% CI were estimated by means of multiple Poisson regression to identify journal and article characteristics (publication year, multicentre design, structured abstract recommendations, effective sample size, effective abstract word counts and journal impact factor) possibly associated with the total number of fulfilled items.

Study characteristics: 136 of 673 identified abstracts (published in 36 different journals) fulfilled all eligibility criteria.

Results: The median number of fulfilled items was 7 (95% CI 7 to 8). No abstract reported all 16 recommended items; the maximum total number was 14, the minimum 3 of 16 items. Multivariate analysis only demonstrated the abstracts' word counts as being significantly associated with a better reporting of abstracts (Poisson regression-based IRR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.003).

Conclusions: Reporting quality of RCT abstracts on AMD investigations showed a considerable potential for improvement to meet the CONSORT abstract reporting recommendations. Furthermore, word counts of abstracts were identified as significantly associated with the overall abstract reporting quality.

Keywords: CONSORT statement; RCT; reporting quality; structured abstract.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Checklist / standards
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Guideline Adherence / standards
  • Humans
  • Macular Degeneration / therapy*
  • Publications / standards*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards*