Consistency of Continuous Ambulatory Interstitial Glucose Monitoring Sensors

Biosensors (Basel). 2018 May 16;8(2):49. doi: 10.3390/bios8020049.

Abstract

Aims: The abdominal region is the most common location for continuous glucose monitor (CGM) sensor insertion. However, a paucity of post-marketing data is available to demonstrate intra-individual consistency of CGM readings at different abdominal insertion sites.

Methods: Healthy adults (fasting glucose (FG) < 5.5 mmol/L; BMI < 30 kg/m²) were recruited and a CGM sensor was placed on each side of the abdomen. Postprandial and continuous 48-h interstitial glucose levels were analyzed.

Results: There was no significant difference in the 3-h postprandial glucose (PPG) level derived from the left versus right CGM, which remained non-significant after adjusting for waist circumference or FG. Among the glucose levels recorded over 48-h, values on the left site were greater in 3.6% of the data points (p < 0.05). After adjusting for waist circumference, only 0.5% of the glucose values remained significantly greater on the left (p < 0.05). When adjusted for FG, similar results were observed. For both PPG and 48-h readings, the mean absolute relative difference was not significant between the two abdominal sites.

Conclusions: CGM-derived glucose measures were highly consistent between the left and right abdomen during both the postprandial and post-absorptive periods.

Keywords: continuous glucose monitoring; interstitial glucose sensors; intra-subject agreement; postprandial glucose.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Glucose / metabolism*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Ambulatory / methods*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Glucose