Pollen analysis of Australian honey

PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197545. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Pollen analysis is widely used to verify the geographic origin of honeys, but has never been employed in Australia. In this study, we analysed the pollen content of 173 unblended honey samples sourced from most of the commercial honey producing regions in southern Australia. Southern Australian vegetation is dominated by Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae) forests and, as expected, most Australian honeys are palynologically dominated by Eucalyptus, while other important components include Myrtaceae taxa such as Corymbia/Angophora and the tribe Leptospermeae; plus Brassicaceae, Echium, Macadamia, and Acacia. An important feature of the honeys is the number of Myrtaceae pollen morphotypes per sample, which is generally high (mean = 4.6) compared to honeys produced outside of Australia, including Eucalyptus honeys produced in the Mediterranean region, and honeys produced in South America, which has its own rich indigenous Myrtaceae flora. In the latter regions, the number of Myrtaceae morphotypes is apparently generally ≤2. A high number of Myrtaceae morphotypes may be a feasible criterion for authenticating the origin of Australian honeys, since most Australian honey is produced by honey bees mainly working indigenous floral resources. Myrtaceae morphotype diversity is a convenient melissopalynological measure that could be applied even where detailed knowledge of the pollen morphology of the many component genera and species is absent. Palynological criteria developed in Europe for authenticating Eucalyptus honeys should not be relied upon for Australian honeys, since those criteria are not based on samples of Australian honey.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Eucalyptus
  • Honey*
  • Magnoliopsida
  • Microscopy
  • Pollen* / ultrastructure

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Australian Government Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (now AgriFutures Australia, www.agrifutures.com.au), Grant PRJ-009770 to JMKS. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. However, the funders and two industry partners commented on the manuscript.