Metamorphopsia Score and Central Visual Field Outcomes in Diabetic Cystoid Macular Edema

Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 18:2018:4954532. doi: 10.1155/2018/4954532. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Aim: To detect abnormality of the visual function in naïve patients with cystoid diabetic macular edema (DME) using M-charts, Amsler test, and white on white (W/W) and blue on yellow (B/Y) perimetry.

Methods: There were 64 eyes included in the study: 30 eyes with DME, 22 eyes with diabetes without DME, and 12 eyes of normal subjects. Conventional W/W perimetry and B/Y perimetry were performed within the central 10° of the visual field. To assess metamorphopsia, Amsler test and M-charts were used.

Results: The rate of detection of metamorphopsia was 37% with Amsler test examination and 50% with M-charts. Specificity of both tests was 100%. We found a significant difference between vertical scores of M-charts in all groups, but not in horizontal scores (p < 0.0001). Mean defect (MD) was 8.9 dB and 3.6 dB and loss variance (LV) 4.8 dB and 3.3 dB (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: M-chart is more sensitive than Amsler test method for detection of metamorphopsia. The MD and LV are higher in b/y in comparison to W/W perimetry. B/Y perimetry and M-charts are more sensitive than conventional methods for detecting the visual function loss in cystoid DME.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Diabetes Complications / physiopathology*
  • Diabetic Retinopathy / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Macular Edema / physiopathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Vision Disorders / physiopathology*
  • Visual Acuity / physiology
  • Visual Fields / physiology