Treatment in a preventive cardiology clinic utilizing advanced practice providers effectively closes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk-management gaps among a primary-prevention population compared with a propensity-matched primary-care cohort: A team-based care model and its impact on lipid and blood pressure management

Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jun;41(6):817-824. doi: 10.1002/clc.22963. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

Abstract

Background: Advanced practice providers (APPs) can fill care gaps created by physician shortages and improve adherence/compliance with preventive ASCVD interventions.

Hypothesis: APPs utilizing guideline-based algorithms will more frequently escalate ASCVD risk factor therapies.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 595 patients enrolled in a preventive cardiology clinic (PCC) utilizing APPs compared with a propensity-matched cohort (PMC) of 595 patients enrolled in primary-care clinics alone. PCC patients were risk-stratified using Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS).

Results: Baseline demographics were balanced between the groups. CACS was more commonly obtained in PCC patients (P < 0.001), resulting in reclassification of 30.6% patients to a higher risk category, including statin therapy in 26.6% of low-FRS PCC patients with CACS ≥75th MESA percentile. Aspirin initiation was higher for high and intermediate FRS patients in the PCC (P < 0.001). Post-intervention mean LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides (all P < 0.05) were lower in the PCC group. Compliance with appropriate lipid treatment was higher in intermediate to high FRS patients (P = 0.004) in the PCC group. Aggressive LDL-C and non-HDL-C treatment goals (<70 mg/dL, P = 0.005 and < 130 mg/dL, P < 0.001, respectively), were more commonly achieved in high-FRS PCC patients. Median post-intervention SBP was lower among intermediate and low FRS patients (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cumulatively, this resulted in a reduction in median post-intervention PCC FRS across all initial FRS risk categories (P < 0.001 for all).

Conclusions: APPs within a PCC effectively risk-stratify and aggressively manage ASCVD risk factors, resulting in a reduction in post-intervention FRS.

Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Blood Pressure Control and Regulation; Computed Tomography; General Clinical Cardiology/Adult; Imaging; Preventive Cardiology.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Algorithms
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities* / standards
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Atherosclerosis / diagnosis
  • Atherosclerosis / epidemiology
  • Atherosclerosis / prevention & control*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Dyslipidemias / blood
  • Dyslipidemias / diagnosis
  • Dyslipidemias / drug therapy*
  • Dyslipidemias / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / diagnosis
  • Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Hypertension / epidemiology
  • Hypertension / physiopathology
  • Hypolipidemic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Lipids / blood
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nurse Practitioners* / standards
  • Patient Care Team* / standards
  • Physician Assistants* / standards
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Primary Health Care* / standards
  • Primary Prevention / methods*
  • Primary Prevention / standards
  • Professional Practice Gaps* / standards
  • Propensity Score
  • Protective Factors
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Hypolipidemic Agents
  • Lipids