Investigating the molecular basis for heterophylly in the aquatic plant Potamogeton octandrus (Potamogetonaceae) with comparative transcriptomics

PeerJ. 2018 Feb 28:6:e4448. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4448. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Many plant species exhibit different leaf morphologies within a single plant, or heterophylly. The molecular mechanisms regulating this phenomenon, however, have remained elusive. In this study, the transcriptomes of submerged and floating leaves of an aquatic heterophyllous plant, Potamogeton octandrus Poir, at different stages of development, were sequenced using high-throughput sequencing (RNA-Seq), in order to aid gene discovery and functional studies of genes involved in heterophylly. A total of 81,103 unigenes were identified in submerged and floating leaves and 6,822 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparing samples at differing time points of development. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis categorized these unigenes into 128 pathways. A total of 24,025 differentially expressed genes were involved in carbon metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of amino acids, ribosomal processes, and plant-pathogen interactions. In particular, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis categorized a total of 70 DEGs into plant hormone signal transduction pathways. The high-throughput transcriptomic results presented here highlight the potential for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying heterophylly, which is still poorly understood. Further, these data provide a framework to better understand heterophyllous leaf development in P. octandrus via targeted studies utilizing gene cloning and functional analyses.

Keywords: Gene expression; Heterophyllous leaves; Potamogeton octandrus; Transcriptome.

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20110141110019), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31270278 and 31570220), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDPB02), and the Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Y655261W03). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.