Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high versus low-to-moderate intensity resistance and endurance exercise interventions among cancer survivors

J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Jun;12(3):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0681-0. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high intensity (HI) versus low-to-moderate intensity (LMI) exercise on physical fitness, fatigue, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer survivors.

Methods: Two hundred seventy-seven cancer survivors participated in the Resistance and Endurance exercise After ChemoTherapy (REACT) study and were randomized to 12 weeks of HI (n = 139) or LMI exercise (n = 138) that had similar exercise types, durations, and frequencies, but different intensities. Measurements were performed at baseline (4-6 weeks after primary treatment), and 12 (i.e., short term) and 64 (i.e., longer term) weeks later. Outcomes included cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, self-reported fatigue, HRQoL, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and societal costs. Linear mixed models were conducted to study (a) differences in effects between HI and LMI exercise at longer term, (b) within-group changes from short term to longer term, and (c) the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective.

Results: At longer term, intervention effects on role (β = 5.9, 95% CI = 0.5; 11.3) and social functioning (β = 5.7, 95%CI = 1.7; 9.6) were larger for HI compared to those for LMI exercise. No significant between-group differences were found for physical fitness and fatigue. Intervention-induced improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness and HRQoL were maintained between weeks 12 and 64, but not for fatigue. From a societal perspective, the probability that HI was cost-effective compared to LMI exercise was 0.91 at 20,000€/QALY and 0.95 at 52,000€/QALY gained, mostly due to significant lower healthcare costs in HI exrcise.

Conclusions: At longer term, we found larger intervention effects on role and social functioning for HI than for LMI exercise. Furthermore, HI exercise was cost-effective with regard to QALYs compared to LMI exercise.

Trial registration: This study is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register [NTR2153 [ http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2153 ]] on the 5th of January 2010.

Implications for cancer survivors: Exercise is recommended to be part of standard cancer care, and HI may be preferred over LMI exercise.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Exercise intensity; Fatigue; Neoplasms; Physical fitness; Quality of life.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cancer Survivors* / statistics & numerical data
  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Endurance Training* / economics
  • Endurance Training* / methods
  • Exercise Therapy* / economics
  • Exercise Therapy* / methods
  • Fatigue
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle Strength
  • Netherlands / epidemiology
  • Physical Fitness / physiology
  • Quality of Life
  • Resistance Training* / economics
  • Resistance Training* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • NTR/NTR2153