The conventional tools to measure spasticity exhibited insufficient test-retest or inter-rater reliability. Therefore, the spasticity measurement using an isokinetic device has been proposed to improve these reliabilities of the angle of catch (AoC) measurements; however, this proposal has not been investigated in a standardized manner. In this study, the comparison of the AoC measurement was performed using two modes (isokinetic and manual motion) to investigate whether the standardized isokinetic motion could increase the reliabilities. Motion consistency was calculated using a newly developed index. To analyze the effect of the motion standardization, AoC were estimated using EMG data for both modes, and to compare the measurement reliability, AoC for isokinetic mode was estimated using both EMG and torque data. Although the test-retest reliability for manual motion was excellent, the use of isokinetic motion improved it to the level of extremely excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the inter-rater reliability of manual motion was 0.788, which was near the lower limit of the excellent. Isokinetic motion improved it to the ICC of 0.890 and 0.931 based on the EMG and torque, respectively. These improvements in reliabilities reduced the measurement errors, sample size, and need for the same rater in clinical trials.
Keywords: Electromyography; Isokinetic; Muscle Sspasticity; Quantification; Reliability; Stretch reflex; Stroke; Torque.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.