Aim: The importance of early intervention in psychiatry is widely recognized among psychiatrists. However, it is unknown whether precise knowledge of at-risk mental state has been disseminated. With this survey, we aimed to reveal how Japanese psychiatrists diagnose patients with at-risk mental state and prescribe treatment strategies for them.
Methods: Using fictional case vignettes, we conducted a questionnaire survey of psychiatrists (n = 1399) who worked in Tokyo. We mailed study documents to all eligible participants in November 2015 with a requested return date in December.
Results: Two hundred and sixty (19.3%) psychiatrists responded to the survey. Their correct diagnosis rates for the patients in the at-risk mental state vignettes were low (14.6% for the vignette describing at-risk mental state with attenuated positive symptom syndrome; 13.1% for the vignette describing at-risk mental state with brief intermittent psychotic syndrome). Many psychiatrists selected pharmacotherapy and antipsychotics to treat patients in the at-risk mental state vignettes. The psychiatrists who correctly diagnosed patients in the at-risk mental state vignettes had significantly fewer years of clinical psychiatric experience than did those who diagnosed them as having a non-at-risk mental state (12.5 years vs 22.7 years for the vignette describing at-risk mental state with attenuated positive symptom syndrome, P < 0.01; 14.3 years vs 22.2 years for the vignette describing at-risk mental state with brief intermittent psychotic syndrome, P < 0.01).
Conclusion: This study suggests that precise knowledge of at-risk mental state has not been disseminated among Japanese psychiatrists.
Keywords: antipsychotics; at-risk mental state; cognitive behavioral therapy; diagnosis; pharmacotherapy.
© 2018 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences © 2018 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.