Effects of Peer-Led Interventions for Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Mar 1;45(2):217-236. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.217-236.

Abstract

Problem identification: To evaluate the effects of peer-led supportive interventions for patients with cancer. .

Literature search: Six electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE®, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ProQuest Medical Library, and CINAHL®) were searched for articles published from 1997 to May 2017. .

Data evaluation: A total of 159 studies were identified. Eighteen (16 randomized, controlled trials [RCTs] and 2 non-RCTs) were eligible for systematic review and 16 for meta-analysis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software were used for analysis. .

Synthesis: The authors synthesized the results of the effect size of each trial according to cancer symptoms, coping, emotional health, quality of life, self-efficacy, sexuality, social support, and health-related behaviors. .

Implications for research: The findings from this study suggest that an additional tiered evaluation that has a theoretical underpinning and high-quality methodology is required to confirm the efficacy of peer-led supportive interventions within cancer care models.

Keywords: cancer; intervention; meta-analysis; partner; peer.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Behavior Therapy / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Peer Group*
  • Quality of Life / psychology*
  • Social Support*
  • Stress, Psychological / therapy*