Reduced translucency and the addition of black patterns increase the catch of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, on yellow sticky traps

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0193064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193064. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a pest of a wide range of vegetable and ornamental crops in greenhouses around the world. Yellow sticky traps are highly attractive to flying adults and so are frequently used to monitor the pest. Our aim was to test whether changes in trap translucency or the addition of printed black patterns could increase the catch on yellow sticky traps in greenhouses. Field trials were carried out in commercial crops of strawberry and tomato under glass over three years. Reduced trap translucency increased trap catches by a factor of 1.5 to 7.0 and the catch increased significantly for both females and males. Spectrometer measurements showed that the increased catch was consistent with an increased landing stimulus from a colour opponency mechanism i.e. the ratio of energy from 500-640 nm to the energy from 300-500 nm. Printed black patterns increased trap catches on specific types of trap, by a factor of 1.4 to 2.3, and the catch increased significantly for both females and males. The patterns increased trap catch on moderately translucent traps, but decreased trap catch on less translucent traps. The evidence points to a contrast/edge effect of pattern, but laboratory experiments are needed to clarify this. Exploitation of these translucency and pattern effects could improve the efficacy of yellow traps for monitoring and mass trapping in crops.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Crop Production / methods
  • Female
  • Hemiptera*
  • Insect Control / instrumentation
  • Insect Control / methods*
  • Male

Grants and funding

The work was funded by a Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP009757) from Innovate UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/innovate-uk) awarded to WDJK and JGCH. It was co-funded by the Company Partner, Russell IPM Ltd. NH is an employee of Russell IPM Ltd. CS became an employee of Russell IPM Ltd in October 2016. SA is the managing director and part-owner of Russell IPM Ltd. Russell IPM Ltd provided support in the form of salaries for authors NH, SA and CS, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. Russell IPM Ltd could object to publication if it were prejudicial to intellectual property or commercial interests. No objections were raised.