Objective: The present study was performed to localize the articular deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal in joints. We compare the detection efficiencies of dual-energy CT (DECT) and ultrasound scans.
Methods: Analyses by DECT and ultrasound were performed with 184 bilateral joints of the lower limbs of 54 consecutive gout patients. All joints were categorized into (1) knee, (2) ankle, (3) MTP1, and (4) MTP2, and sorted into those with and those without detectable MSU deposition. The comparison of the positive rate between DECT and ultrasound and the agreement was performed using the McNemar test and the Cohen's κ coefficient, respectively. Next, we listed the MSU crystal deposition as assessed by ultrasound between the DECT-positive and -negative joints according to their interior structure. We included tendons, synovia, cartilage, subcutaneous tissue, etc. RESULTS: Among all joints, the percentages with MSU crystal deposition detected by DECT (99/184, 53.8%) and ultrasound (106/184, 57.6%) were comparable (P = 0.530 > 0.05). For MTP1 (21/34, 61.8%; 12/34, 35.3%; P < 0.05) and MTP2-5 (17/34, 50.0%; 10/34, 29.4%, P < 0.05), ultrasound and DECT were more efficient, respectively. The data concordance in 46 of 50 joints (92.00%; κ = 0.769, P < 0.05) for knee; and 27 of 34 joints (79.41%; κ = 0.588, P < 0.05) for MTP2-5 and suggested that tendons were the most frequent anatomical location of MSU crystal deposition.
Conclusions: The tendons are the most frequent anatomical location of MSU crystal depositions. The concordance rate of knee joints and MTP2-5 joints shows good agreement between DECT and ultrasound depending on the location.
Keywords: Concordance rate; Detection efficiency; Dual-energy CT (DECT); MSU crystal deposition; Ultrasound.