Immunophenotypic characterization of human T cells after in vitro exposure to different silicone breast implant surfaces

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192108. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The most common complication of silicone breast implants is capsular contracture (massive scar formation around the implant). We postulate that capsular contracture is always a sequel to inflammatory processes, with both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms participating. In general, fibroblasts and macrophages have been used as cell types to evaluate in vitro the biocompatibility of breast implant surfaces. Moreover, also T cells have been found at the implant site at the initial stage of fibrous capsule formation. However, only few studies have addressed the influence of surfaces with different textures on T-cell responses. The aim of the present study was to investigate the immune response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to commercially available silicone breast implants in vitro. PBMC from healthy female blood donors were cultured on each silicone surface for 4 days. Proliferation and phenotype of cultured cells were assessed by flow cytometry. Cytokine levels were determined by multiplex and real-time assay. We found that silicone surfaces do not induce T-cell proliferation, nor do they extensively alter the proportion of T cell subsets (CD4, CD8, naïve, effector memory). Interestingly, cytokine profiling identified matrix specific differences, especially for IL-6 and TNF-α on certain surface topographies that could lead to increased fibrosis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Breast Implants*
  • Cell Proliferation
  • Cytokines / blood
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Humans
  • Immunophenotyping*
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Silicone Gels*
  • T-Lymphocytes / immunology*

Substances

  • Cytokines
  • Silicone Gels

Grants and funding

This project has been supported by Estabilishement Lab, Costa Rica. The funder had no role in study design, in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.