Ligand dynamics and protonation preferences of Rh and Ir complexes bearing an almost, but not quite, pendent base

Dalton Trans. 2018 Feb 20;47(8):2670-2682. doi: 10.1039/c7dt04259k.

Abstract

Pendent nucleophiles are essential partners in the cleavage and formation of bonds with hydrogen (e.g. protonation/deprotonation), but binding of the pendent group to the metal and the potential trapping of complexes in inactive states are a significant problem. The dipyridylmethane-based ligand framework bis(2-pyridyl)-N-pyrrolidinomethane (R,pyrCPy2), bearing a hemilabile pyrrolidine moiety, has been synthesized and complexes of the type [(R,pyrCPy2)M(COD)]X (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) were prepared. The solution-phase ligand dynamics and relative protonation preferences were investigated via1H NMR spectroscopy; although favorable, pendent amine binding does not kinetically inhibit pendent base protonation. Protonation at the metal (with concomitant pyrrolidine binding) has been found to be favorable for Ir, whereas N-protonation is favorable for Rh. DFT calculations predict that the RhIII hydrides have much higher relative acidities than their Ir congeners (ΔpKa ≃ 7-8 in CH2Cl2), and are also more acidic than the strong acid [H(OEt2)2][B(C6F5)4].