[What are the real purpose and scope of screening for aneuploidy?]

Abstract

In France, the recommended method for Down syndrome screening is the first trimester combined test, the risk assessment, based on maternal age, ultrasound measurement of fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum markers (free β-hCG and PAPP-A). The Down syndrome detection rate is 78.7% at a screen positive rate of 5%. However, the best screening test is the integrated test using a combination of first trimester combined test and second trimester quadruple test (serum α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated E₃, and dimeric inhibin-A) and being able to achieve a detection rate for Down syndrome of approximately 96% at a screen-positive rate of 5%. In recent years, the isolation of small fragments of "fetal" cell-free DNA in the maternal blood dramatically changed the screening strategy paradigm allowing a Down syndrome detection rate and false positive rate of 99.2 and 0.09%, respectively. However, aneuploidy screening based on cell-free DNA presents two major limitations which must be taken into account because they considerably limit its benefit: (i) not every woman will receive an interpretable result and that those who fail to receive a result are at increased risk for fetal aneuploidy: whether an inconclusive result is treated as screen positive or screen negative affects the overall detection rate (sensitivity) and false-positive rate (specificity) of the test; (ii) the limited number of targeted aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, 13 and common sex chromosome aneuploidies) in contrast to conventional noninvasive screening which is also able to detect rare aneuploidies, duplications, deletions, and other structural rearrangements. Of course, genetic counseling has to include a discussion about benefits and limitations of aneuploidy screening based on cell-free DNA. However, it should not be considered as a new screening test to substitute for conventional noninvasive screening. Moreover, if the ultimate goal is to deliver the most information about potential risk of various chromosomal abnormalities associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, then current cell-free DNA screening strategies may not be the best approach. These data highlight the limitations of cell-free DNA screening and the importance of a clear and fair information during pretest genetic counseling about benefits and limitations of any prenatal noninvasive screening (whether conventional or by cell-free DNA), but also about risks and benefits of invasive diagnostic procedures (in first- or second-line), especially since the cytogenetic analysis with chromosomal microarray analysis has improved the detection of genome microdeletions and microduplications (variants of the copy number) that can not be detected by standard cytogenetic analysis.

Keywords: Aneuploidy screening; Cell-free DNA screening; Diagnostic prénatal; Dépistage de l’ADN libre circulant; Dépistage des aneuploïdie; Dépistage par marqueurs multiples; Dépistage prénatal non invasif; Multiple marker screening; Non-invasive prenatal screening; Prenatal diagnosis.