Can data from disparate long-term fish monitoring programs be used to increase our understanding of regional and continental trends in large river assemblages?

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0191472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191472. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Understanding trends in the diverse resources provided by large rivers will help balance tradeoffs among stakeholders and inform strategies to mitigate the effects of landscape scale stressors such as climate change and invasive species. Absent a cohesive coordinated effort to assess trends in important large river resources, a logical starting point is to assess our ability to draw inferences from existing efforts. In this paper, we use a common analytical framework to analyze data from five disparate fish monitoring programs to better understand the nature of spatial and temporal trends in large river fish assemblages. We evaluated data from programs that monitor fishes in the Colorado, Columbia, Illinois, Mississippi, and Tallapoosa rivers using non-metric dimensional scaling ordinations and associated tests to evaluate trends in fish assemblage structure and native fish biodiversity. Our results indicate that fish assemblages exhibited significant spatial and temporal trends in all five of the rivers. We also document native species diversity trends that were variable within and between rivers and generally more evident in rivers with higher species richness and programs of longer duration. We discuss shared and basin-specific landscape level stressors. Having a basic understanding of the nature and extent of trends in fish assemblages is a necessary first step towards understanding factors affecting biodiversity and fisheries in large rivers.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biodiversity
  • Climate Change
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / trends
  • Ecological Parameter Monitoring / methods
  • Ecological Parameter Monitoring / statistics & numerical data
  • Ecosystem
  • Fisheries
  • Fishes*
  • Humans
  • Rivers*
  • United States

Grants and funding

Funding for the work on the Colorado River was provided by the US Bureau of Reclamation through the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program. Work on the Columbia River was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (project number 1986-050-00), the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the state of Oregon. The Illinois River portion of this project was supported by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (P.L. 81-6814, Dingell-Johnson/Wallop-Breaux), with funds administered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Fish monitoring activities on the Mississippi River were funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Upper Mississippi River Restoration Program. Work on the Tallapoosa River was funded by the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and the Alabama Power Company. The USGS provided funding for activities directly related to the formation of this manuscript.