The Stockholm-3 Model for Prostate Cancer Detection: Algorithm Update, Biomarker Contribution, and Reflex Test Potential

Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Abstract

Background: It has been shown that the Stockholm-3 model (S3M) outperforms prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening tool for prostate cancer.

Objective: To update the S3M, to give a detailed account of the value of each predictor in the S3M, and to evaluate the S3M as a reflex test for men with PSA ≥3ng/ml.

Design, setting, and participants: During 2012-2015, the Stockholm-3 study evaluated the S3M relative to PSA as tests for Gleason score ≥7 prostate cancers among men aged 50-69 yr. The participants (n=59 159) underwent both tests, and biopsy was recommended if at least one was positive. A total of 5073 men had a biopsy because of elevated PSA (≥3ng/ml).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Logistic regression was used to update the S3M: intact PSA was removed, HOXB13 was included, and the model was fitted to data from the Stockholm-3 training and validation cohorts. To compare S3M with PSA, we fixed the sensitivity for detection of high-grade cancer and evaluated the performance as the number of biopsies needed to achieve that sensitivity for each test.

Results and limitations: The updated S3M slightly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve compared to previously published results (0.75 vs 0.74). When used as a reflex test for men with PSA ≥3ng/ml, S3M reduced the number of biopsies needed by 34% compared to the use of PSA alone, with equal sensitivity. A limitation is the ethnically homogeneous population.

Conclusions: A major problem with PSA screening-too many unnecessary biopsies-can be mitigated if S3M is used as a reflex test.

Patient summary: To find aggressive prostate cancer with the minimum number of negative biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant cancers, we evaluated the use of a personalized diagnostic prediction model as a second test for men with a positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. We found that this two-step approach could reduce prostate biopsies by a third compared to using PSA alone.

Keywords: Paired screen-positive design; Prostate cancer screening; Prostate-specific antigen; Reflex test; Stockholm-3 model.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Algorithms*
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood*
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / genetics
  • Biopsy
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Digital Rectal Examination
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Humans
  • Kallikreins / blood*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / blood*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / blood
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / genetics
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Sweden
  • Unnecessary Procedures
  • Up-Regulation

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • KLK3 protein, human
  • Kallikreins
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen