Health protective behavior scale: Development and psychometric evaluation

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 8;13(1):e0190390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190390. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Objective: A healthy lifestyle includes health protective and health promoting behaviors. Health promoting lifestyle profiles have been developed, but measures of health protective behavior are still lacking. This study sought to develop a health protecting behavior scale.

Methods: An initial item pool for the Health Protective Behavior Scale (HPBS) was generated based on read and referred literature and a single-item open-ended survey. An expert group screened this initial item pool using an item-level content validity index. Pilot testing was conducted. The degree of variation, the response rate, the item-total correlation coefficient, and the factor loading in factor analysis and item analysis were used to screen items using data of pilot testing. 454 subjects were recruited evaluate the psychometric properties of the HPBS. Analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, parallel analysis, correlation analysis and criterion validity analysis.

Results: The final iteration of the HPBS was developed with 32 items and five dimensions: interpersonal support, general behavior, self-knowledge, nutrition behavior and health care. Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability were 0.89 and 0.89 respectively. Correlation coefficients of the five dimensions ranged from 0.28 to 0.55. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and on the HPBS was 0.34.

Conclusions: HPBS has sufficient validity and reliability to measure health protective behaviors in adults.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Health Promotion / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Life Style
  • Psychometrics*

Grants and funding

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, 81302518 (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.