Ethics research in critically ill patients

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 May;42(4):247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
[Article in English, Spanish]

Abstract

Research in critical care patients is an ethical obligation. The ethical conflicts of intensive care research arise from patient vulnerability, since during ICU admission these individuals sometimes lose all or part of their decision making capacity and autonomy. We therefore must dedicate effort to ensure that neither treatment (sedation or mechanical ventilation) nor the disease itself can affect the right to individual freedom of the participants in research, improving the conditions under which informed consent must be obtained. Fragility, understood as a decrease in the capacity to tolerate adverse effects derived from research must be taken into account in selecting the participants. Research should be relevant, not possible to carry out in non-critical patients, and a priori should offer potential benefits that outweigh the risks that must be known and assumable, based on principles of responsibility.

Keywords: Bioethics; Bioética; Consentimiento informado; Critically ill patient; Inform consent; Investigación; Paciente crítico; Research.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Confidentiality
  • Critical Illness* / psychology
  • Ethics Committees, Research
  • Ethics, Research*
  • Human Experimentation / ethics*
  • Human Experimentation / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Human Experimentation / standards
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / adverse effects
  • Informed Consent / ethics
  • Informed Consent / psychology
  • Mental Competency
  • Patient Rights*
  • Patient Selection / ethics
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Respiration, Artificial
  • Scientific Misconduct
  • Spain
  • Third-Party Consent / ethics

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives