Multi-omics integration-a comparison of unsupervised clustering methodologies

Brief Bioinform. 2019 Jul 19;20(4):1269-1279. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx167.

Abstract

With the recent developments in the field of multi-omics integration, the interest in factors such as data preprocessing, choice of the integration method and the number of different omics considered had increased. In this work, the impact of these factors is explored when solving the problem of sample classification, by comparing the performances of five unsupervised algorithms: Multiple Canonical Correlation Analysis, Multiple Co-Inertia Analysis, Multiple Factor Analysis, Joint and Individual Variation Explained and Similarity Network Fusion. These methods were applied to three real data sets taken from literature and several ad hoc simulated scenarios to discuss classification performance in different conditions of noise and signal strength across the data types. The impact of experimental design, feature selection and parameter training has been also evaluated to unravel important conditions that can affect the accuracy of the result.

Keywords: biological systems; data preprocessing; molecular-level interaction; unsupervised classification.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Animals
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Computational Biology / methods*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Databases, Factual
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Genomics / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Metabolomics / statistics & numerical data
  • Mice
  • Models, Biological
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Proteomics / statistics & numerical data
  • Systems Biology
  • Systems Integration*
  • Unsupervised Machine Learning* / statistics & numerical data