Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers

Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7.

Abstract

This paper concerns the responsibility of co-authors in cases of scientific misconduct. Arguments in research integrity guidelines and in the bioethics literature concerning authorship responsibilities are discussed. It is argued that it is unreasonable to claim that for every case where a research paper is found to be fraudulent, each author is morally responsible for all aspects of that paper, or that one particular author has such a responsibility. It is further argued that it is more constructive to specify what task responsibilities come with different roles in a project and describe what kinds of situations or events call for some kind of action, and what the appropriate actions might be.

Keywords: Accountability; Authorship; Research ethics; Research integrity; Responsibility; Scientific misconduct.

MeSH terms

  • Authorship / standards*
  • Biomedical Research / ethics*
  • Dissent and Disputes
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Humans
  • Moral Obligations
  • Scientific Misconduct / ethics*
  • Social Responsibility