Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: A scoping review

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188663. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background: Many people with chronic conditions have complex health needs often due to multiple chronic conditions, psychiatric comorbidities, psychosocial issues, or a combination of these factors. They are at high risk of frequent use of healthcare services. To offer these patients interventions adapted to their needs, it is crucial to be able to identify them early.

Objective: The aim of this study was to find all existing screening tools that identify patients with complex health needs at risk of frequent use of healthcare services, and to highlight their principal characteristics. Our purpose was to find a short, valid screening tool to identify adult patients of all ages.

Methods: A scoping review was performed on articles published between 1985 and July 2016, retrieved through a comprehensive search of the Scopus and CINAHL databases, following the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), and completed by Levac et al. (2010).

Results: Of the 3,818 articles identified, 30 were included, presenting 14 different screening tools. Seven tools were self-reported. Five targeted adult patients, and nine geriatric patients. Two tools were designed for specific populations. Four can be completed in 15 minutes or less. Most screening tools target elderly persons. The INTERMED self-assessment (IM-SA) targets adults of all ages and can be completed in less than 15 minutes.

Conclusion: Future research could evaluate its usefulness as a screening tool for identifying patients with complex needs at risk of becoming high users of healthcare services.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Health Services / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Services Needs and Demand*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Chronic Conditions / therapy*

Grants and funding

This work is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant number 318771, and from the Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé de l’Université de Sherbrooke. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.