Background and aim: Although postoperative cholangioscopy (POC) is considered to be an effective treatment for residual hepatolithiasis after surgery, its security and validity still need to be improved. This study compared wire-guided POC (WG-POC) versus traditional POC (T-POC) in the management of patients with residual hepatolithiasis.
Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 203 patients who suffered from hepatolithiasis and underwent hepatectomy as initial intervention from 1 January 2016 to 1 January 2017. After surgery, 110 patients were subjected to T-POC and 93 to WG-POC for eliminating residual hepatolithiasis. Perioperative course and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: No significant differences in clinical characteristics or distribution of residual hepatolithiasis between the WG-POC and T-POC groups were observed (P > 0.05). However, overall POC interventional sessions (2.9 ± 0.85 vs 4.0 ± 1.21 times), average operating time (264.8 ± 103.61 vs 389.4 ± 136.26 min), overall complications rate (18.28% vs 32.73%), and overall T-tube retaining time (21.8 ± 6.20 vs 28.8 ± 8.09 days) were lower in the WG-POC group than in the T-POC group (P < 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences between the two groups (WG-POC vs T-POC) in recurrence (4.30% vs 4.55%) and residual calculi (8.60% vs 6.36%) at half-a-year follow up (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Routine wire guidance may improve the outcome of cholangioscopy in managing complicated residual hepatolithiasis, being associated with clear advantages such as shorter operating time and number of POC interventions, reduced T-tube retaining time, and fewer postoperative complications.
Keywords: T-tube drainage; choledochojejunostomy; choledocholithotomy; residual hepatolithiasis; wire-guided postoperative cholangioscopy.
© 2017 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.