Routine Use of Quantitative Disease Activity Measurements among US Rheumatologists: Implications for Treat-to-target Management Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

J Rheumatol. 2018 Jan;45(1):40-44. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170548. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to examine why real-world practices and attitudes regarding quantitative measurements of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have received limited attention.

Methods: An e-mail survey asked US rheumatologists to self-report on their use of quantitative measurements (metric).

Results: Among 439 respondents, metric rheumatologists (58%) were more likely to be in group practice and to use tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. The quantitative tools most commonly used were the Health Assessment Questionnaire (35.5%) and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (27.1%). Reasons for not measuring included time needed and electronic availability. Based on simulated case scenarios, providing more quantitative information increased the likelihood that a patient would change to a different disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or biologic.

Conclusion: Routine use of quantitative measurement for patients in the United States with RA is increasing over time but remains low.

Keywords: RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOLOGY; SURVEY.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / diagnosis*
  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Database Management Systems
  • Disease Management*
  • Female
  • Group Practice
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Quality of Health Care*
  • Rheumatologists / psychology*
  • Self Report
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • United States