Two subtypes of psychopathic criminals differ in negative affect and history of childhood abuse

Psychol Trauma. 2018 Jul;10(4):444-451. doi: 10.1037/tra0000328. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

Abstract

Objective: Specification of the etiological mechanisms underlying psychopathy is a key step in developing more effective methods for preventing and remediating the callous and impulsive behavior that characterizes the disorder. Theoretical conceptualizations of psychopathic subtypes propose that a primary variant largely stems from impoverished affect, whereas a secondary variant is hypothesized to develop subsequent to adverse environmental experiences (e.g., childhood maltreatment). However, there has been a dearth of research demonstrating that psychopathic subtypes actually differ in terms of experienced childhood maltreatment in an adult offender population.

Method: The current study employed model-based cluster analysis (MBCA) in a sample of incarcerated, psychopathic males (n = 110) to identify subtypes of psychopathic offenders based on a broad personality assessment.

Results: Two subgroups emerged: 1 with high levels of negative affect (high-NA) and 1 with low levels of negative affect (low-NA). The high-NA subgroup scored significantly higher on measures of childhood maltreatment.

Conclusion: These results provide support for theoretical conceptualizations of psychopathic subtypes, suggesting that psychopathic offenders with high levels of negative affect experience a greater degree of childhood maltreatment. (PsycINFO Database Record

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Adult Survivors of Child Abuse / psychology*
  • Affect*
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder / classification
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder / psychology*
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Criminals / psychology*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Psychological
  • Personality Tests
  • Prisoners / psychology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult