Effect of different orientations of screw fixation for radial head fractures: a biomechanical comparison

J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Oct 2;12(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0641-9.

Abstract

Background: Screw fixation is a common method used for the treatment of Mason type II radial head fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of three different screw orientations used for fixation of Mason type II radial head fractures.

Methods: We sawed 24 medium-frequency fourth-generation Synbone radial bones to simulate unstable radial head fractures, which we then fixed with three different screw orientations. Implants were tested under axial load by the tension-torsion composite test system. If the implant-radial constructs did not fail after the axial load test, an axial failure load was added to the remaining constructs.

Results: The stiffness of the divergent group was the highest of the three orientations, and this group had statistically significant difference from the other two groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the convergence group and the parallel group (p > 0.05). When the displacement reached 2 mm, the load of the divergent screw was still larger than the other two groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The divergent screw orientation was the most stable and had the greatest control of Mason type II fractures of these three groups. Therefore, it can be better applied in clinical settings.

Keywords: Biomechanical comparison; Different orientation; Radial head fractures; Screw.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Bone Screws*
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / instrumentation
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods*
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing / methods
  • Orientation
  • Radiography
  • Radius Fractures / diagnostic imaging
  • Radius Fractures / surgery*
  • Weight-Bearing