Comparison of sprotte and Quincke needles with respect to spinal fluid leakage using artificial spinal cord

Yoshikiyo Amaki; Michihiko Moriyama; Toshimichi Kuzuta; Keiko Yabe; Misato Kaneko

doi:10.1007/BF02480746

Comparison of sprotte and Quincke needles with respect to spinal fluid leakage using artificial spinal cord

J Anesth. 1997 Dec;11(4):288-291. doi: 10.1007/BF02480746.

Authors

Yoshikiyo Amaki¹, Michihiko Moriyama¹, Toshimichi Kuzuta¹, Keiko Yabe¹, Misato Kaneko¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishisinbashi, Minato-ku, 105, Tokyo, Japan.

PMID: 28921068
DOI: 10.1007/BF02480746

Abstract

Purpose: This research investigated whether the Sprotte needle causes less leakage of CSF than the Quincke needle in the artificial spinal cord.

Methods: The changes in intradural pressure, extradural pressure, and leaked volume of CSF were evaluated following puncture with Sprotte and Quincke needles in the artificial spinal cord.

Results: The decrease in intradural pressure was 9.7±1.8 mm H₂O with the Sprotte needle and 20.5±2.7 mm H₂O with the Quincke needle (P<0.05). The volume of leakage of artificial CSF was 2.0±0.3 ml with the Sprotte needle and 3.3 ±0.3 ml with the Quincke needle (P<0.01). The extradural pressure increase was 166.1±8.2 mm H₂O with the Sprotte needle and 186.8±13.2 mm H₂O with the Quincke needle (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The Sprotte needle produces less CSF leakage than the Quincke needle.

Keywords: Spinal anesthesia; Spinal cord; Spinal fluid.