The Boston Marathon versus the World Marathon Majors

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 1;12(9):e0184024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184024. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare finish times across WMM races for Boston, London, Berlin, Chicago and New York Marathons.

Methods: Race times of the top 10 male and 10 female finishers were analyzed from 2005 to 2014 using the high-performance mixed linear model procedure in the Statistical Analysis System. Venue-to-venue comparisons, as well as comparisons between Boston and other WMM races, with and without factors of temperature, humidity and altitude change were examined.

Results: Performance from 2005 to 2014 in the WMM races was found to improve at a rate of ~1% each 7 years. Despite its higher variability, comparison between Boston's estimated mean finishing time and all other venues revealed moderate positive differences, indicating the Boston event to be typically slower than other venues.

Conclusions: Across the 10-year study period, performance times improved ~1% each 7 years for both genders for the WMM, with the Boston Marathon being slower on average than other WMM venues. Weather rather than course metrics appeared to impact performance times most.

MeSH terms

  • Altitude
  • Athletic Performance*
  • Berlin
  • Boston
  • Chicago
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Humidity
  • London
  • Male
  • New York
  • Running*
  • Temperature
  • Weather

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.