Impact of sheath diameter of different sheath types on vascular complications and mortality in transfemoral TAVI approaches using the Proglide closure device

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183658. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the impact of the sheath diameter on vascular complications and mortality in transfemoral aortic valve implantation.

Method: Between 2012 and 2014, 183 patients underwent the procedure using a sheath diameter of 18-24 F. This collective was divided into two groups: group 1, with a sheath diameter of 18F (G1, n = 94), consisted of patients with 18F Medtronic Sentrant and 18 F Direct Flow sheaths, and group 2 with a sheath diameter of 19-24 F (G2, n = 89) consisted of patients with Edwards expandable e-sheath and Solopath sheaths. Perclose-Proglide® was used as a closure device in all patients.

Results: G1 had significantly more female patients (64.9% vs. 46.1% in G2, p = 0.01) and the average BMI was lower (26 ± 4.5% vs. 27.4 ± 4.7%, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major and minor vascular complications (G1: 12.8% vs. G2: 12.4%, p = 0.9). 30-day mortality was similar in both groups (G1: 6.4 ± 2.5% [95% CI: 0.88-0.98], G2: 3.7 ± 1.9% [95% CI: 0.92-0.99]. The Kaplan Meier analysis of survival revealed no significant differences either.

Conclusion: The difference in sheath diameter had no effect on either incidence or severity of vascular complications. There was no impact on mortality either.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Female
  • Femoral Artery / surgery*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.