Cryopreserved arterial allografts for in situ reconstruction of abdominal aortic native or secondary graft infection

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the early and long-term outcome of cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAAs) used for in situ reconstruction of abdominal aortic native or secondary graft infection and to identify predictors of mortality.

Methods: We retrospectively included 71 patients (mean age, 65.2 years [range, 41-84 years]; men, 91.5%) treated for abdominal aortic native or secondary graft infection (65 prosthetic graft infections; 16 of them had secondary aortoenteric fistula, 2 venous graft infections, and 4 mycotic aneurysms) by in situ reconstruction with CAA in the university hospitals of Clermont-Ferrand and Saint-Etienne from 2000 to 2016. The cryopreservation protocol was identical in both centers (-140°C). Early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) mortality and morbidity, reinfection, and CAA patency were assessed. Computed tomography was performed in all survivors. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed with the log-rank test and multivariate analysis with the Cox regression model.

Results: Mean follow-up was 45 months (0-196 months). Early postoperative mortality rate was 16.9% (11/71). Early postoperative CAA-related mortality rate was 2.8% (2/71); both patients died of proximal anastomotic rupture on postoperative days 4 and 15. Early CAA-related reintervention rate was 5.6% (4/71); all had an anastomotic rupture, and two were lethal. Early postoperative reintervention rate was 15.5% (11/71). Intraoperative bacteriologic samples were positive in 56.3%, and 31% had a sole microorganism. Escherichia coli was more frequently identified in the secondary aortoenteric fistula and Staphylococcus epidermidis in the infected prosthesis. Late CAA-related mortality rate was 2.8%: septic shock at 2 months in one patient and proximal anastomosis rupture at 1 year in one patient. Survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 75%, 64%, and 54%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified type 1 diabetes (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-5.88; P = .04) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 (hazard ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-6.53; P = .035) as predictors of mortality after in situ CAA reconstruction. Reinfection rate was 4% (3/71). Late CAA-related reintervention rate was 12.7% (9/71): proximal anastomotic rupture in one, CAA branch stenosis/thrombosis in five, ureteral-CAA branch fistula in one, and distal anastomosis false aneurysm in two. Primary patency at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 100%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Assisted primary patency at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was 100%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. No aneurysm or dilation was observed.

Conclusions: The prognosis of native or secondary aortic graft infections is poor. Aortic in situ reconstruction with CAA offers acceptable early and late results. Patients with type 1 diabetes and American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 are at higher risk of mortality.