Effect of masticatory stimulation on the quantity and quality of saliva and the salivary metabolomic profile

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 15;12(8):e0183109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183109. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background: This study characterized the changes in quality and quantity of saliva, and changes in the salivary metabolomic profile, to understand the effects of masticatory stimulation.

Methods: Stimulated and unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 55 subjects and salivary hydrophilic metabolites were comprehensively quantified using capillary electrophoresis-time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Results: In total, 137 metabolites were identified and quantified. The concentrations of 44 metabolites in stimulated saliva were significantly higher than those in unstimulated saliva. Pathway analysis identified the upregulation of the urea cycle and synthesis and degradation pathways of glycine, serine, cysteine and threonine in stimulated saliva. A principal component analysis revealed that the effect of masticatory stimulation on salivary metabolomic profiles was less dependent on sample population sex, age, and smoking. The concentrations of only 1 metabolite in unstimulated saliva, and of 3 metabolites stimulated saliva, showed significant correlation with salivary secretion volume, indicating that the salivary metabolomic profile and salivary secretion volume were independent factors.

Conclusions: Masticatory stimulation affected not only salivary secretion volume, but also metabolite concentration patterns. A low correlation between the secretion volume and these patterns supports the conclusion that the salivary metabolomic profile may be a new indicator to characterize masticatory stimulation.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Electrophoresis, Capillary
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Spectrometry
  • Mastication / physiology*
  • Metabolomics / standards*
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Saliva / chemistry*

Grants and funding

This work was supported by research funds from a Grant-in-Aid for challenging Exploratory Research of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (K. Kimoto, no. 25670828), and research funds from the Yamagata Prefectural Government and the city of Tsuruoka. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.