Using Genomic Information to Guide Ibrutinib Treatment Decisions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):845-858. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0519-z.

Abstract

Background: Genomic tests may improve the stratification of patients to receive new therapies in several disease areas. However, the use of expensive targeted therapies can impact on the cost effectiveness of these tests. This study presents an economic evaluation of genomic testing in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the context of the UK National Health Service.

Methods: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses (using life-years and quality-adjusted life-years) were undertaken from a National Health Service and societal perspective. Five strategies were evaluated across several age groups using Markov modelling: three strategies that reflected varying current genetic testing practice and two configurations of genomic testing (including ibrutinib treatment).

Results: Genomic testing strategies yielded the most life-years/quality-adjusted life-years per patient, but were not cost effective compared with a threshold of £30,000 per life-year/quality-adjusted life-year gained. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that there was some uncertainty surrounding this result. A genomic testing strategy becomes the most cost-effective option if a higher end-of-life cost-effectiveness threshold of £50,000 is applied, if a societal costing perspective is considered in 25-year-old patients or if the cost of ibrutinib treatment falls.

Conclusion: Stratifying patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia to targeted treatment using genomic testing improves health outcomes, but will likely only represent a cost-effective use of limited National Health Service resources if a higher cost-effectiveness threshold or societal costing perspective is applied, or if the price of ibrutinib treatment is reduced. This result may be broadly indicative of the likely cost effectiveness of other genomic tests that inform the stratification of patients to high cost-targeted therapies.

MeSH terms

  • Adenine / analogs & derivatives
  • Adult
  • Antineoplastic Agents / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Genomics / methods*
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / drug therapy*
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / economics
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / genetics
  • Markov Chains
  • Piperidines
  • Pyrazoles / economics
  • Pyrazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Pyrimidines / economics
  • Pyrimidines / therapeutic use*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Uncertainty
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Piperidines
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyrimidines
  • ibrutinib
  • Adenine