Controversies Surrounding Critical Care Nutrition: An Appraisal of Permissive Underfeeding, Protein, and Outcomes

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Mar;42(3):508-515. doi: 10.1177/0148607117721908. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Abstract

Over the past few years, numerous studies have called into question the optimal dose, timing, composition, and advancement rate of nutrition during the early acute phase of critical illness. These studies suggest permissive underfeeding with slow advancement may be more beneficial than aggressive full feeding. These counterintuitive results were possibly explained by enhanced autophagy, less hyperglycemia, or prevention of refeeding syndrome. This review underscores the controversies surrounding permissive underfeeding, aims to answer whether permissive underfeeding is appropriate for all critically ill patients, describes the impact of optimal protein delivery on critical care outcomes, discusses nutrition risk, and cogitates on the impact of nutrition on critical care outcomes.

Keywords: hypocaloric feeding; nutrition risk; permissive underfeeding; trophic feeding.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Critical Care / methods
  • Critical Illness / therapy*
  • Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage*
  • Energy Intake
  • Enteral Nutrition / methods
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Nutrition Therapy / methods*
  • Refeeding Syndrome / prevention & control
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Dietary Proteins